دوفصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی

دوفصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی

مراحل دیده بانی تغییرات پارادایمی نظریه های برنامه درسی مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد محلات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، محلات، ایران.
10.22034/hecs.2026.577277.2055
چکیده
دیده‌بانی ،یکی از راهبردهی آینده پژوهی برای مطالعه تغییرات پارادایمی نظریه‌های برنامه‌درسی مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی است. مسئله اساسی اینکه مراحل دیده بانی تغییرات پارادایمی نظریه های برنامه درسی مبتنی برهوش مصنوعی کدامند؟ روش مطالعه به شیوه آینده پژوهی با استراتژی دیده بانی و نیز تحلیل محتوای کیفی انجام شده است. میدان پژوهش شامل کلیه مقالات منتشر شده دربازه زمانی 2026-2020 و نمونه گیری هدفمند تا حد اشباع داده ها به تعداد 39 مقاله و 18 نفر از اساتید خبره تداوم یافت. تحلیل داده ها براساس دسته بندی مفاهیم باز، زیر مقوله ،و مقوله اصلی صورت پذیرفت. اعتباریابی داده ها با روش سه سوسازی انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد، دیده بانی تغییرات پارادایمی نظریه های برنامه درسی مبتنی برهوش مصنوعی مشتمل بر مراحل پنحگانه(تحلیل داده ها: 6 مؤلفه، شناسایی سیگنالها: مؤلفه6، تحلیل پیامدها: 6 مؤلفه ، ساخت سناریوها: 7 مؤلفه ،و تدوین و نهایی‌سازی دلالت‌های سیاستی: 7 مؤلفه) بوده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2019). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27(1), 4-19.
Archer, M. (2020). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ansori, A. Z., & Safrilana, Y. (2026). Advanced Curriculum Development Through Educational Competitions To Strengthen Deep Learning And Academic Talent. JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN, 14(01), 016-022.
Awashreh, R. (2026). Integrating AI Education Strategies for Future-Proofing Curriculum Design in Omani Universities. In AI Education Strategies for Future-Proofing Curriculum Design (pp. 171-196). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Brown, K. D., & Brown, A. L. (2010). Silenced memories: An examination of the sociocultural knowledge on race and racial violence in official school curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(2), 139-154
Barrow, R. (2015). Giving teaching back to teachers: A critical introduction to curriculum theory. Routledge.
Cantoni, D., Chen, Y., Yang, D. Y., Yuchtman, N., & Zhang, Y. J. (2017). Curriculum and ideology. Journal of political economy, 125(2), 338-392.
Cary, L. J. (2006). Curriculum spaces: Discourse, postmodern theory and educational research (Vol. 16). Peter Lang.
Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.
Davis, E., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L., & Iwashyna, S. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 24-52.
DeBoor, S. S. (Ed.). (2026). Keating's curriculum development and evaluation in nursing education. Springer Publishing.
Ellison, G., & Pathak, P. A. (2025). Optimal School System and Curriculum Design: Theory and Evidence (No. w34091). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Fullan, M. (2020). The New Meaning of Educational Change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Goorha, S., & Ungar, L. (2010, July). Discovery of significant emerging trends. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 57-64).
Gouvea, J. S., Sawtelle, V., Geller, B. D., & Turpen, C. (2013). A framework for analyzing interdisciplinary tasks: Implications for student learning and curricular design. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 187-205.
Handelzalts, A. (2019). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning (pp. 159-173). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Haris, Y., Fransiska, J., Kosmanto, D., Arianto, R., & Asha, L. (2026). Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning Management to Improve the Effectiveness of the Independent Curriculum. Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(1), 231-243.
Hassani, Maryam (2023). "Development of schools based on futures research approaches", Quarterly Journal of New Research in Humanities (New Cycle), No. 38, Volume 8, Year 5; pp. 1-16.
Høgdal, C., Rasche, A., Schoeneborn, D., & Scotti, L. (2021). Exploring Student Perceptions of the Hidden Curriculum in Responsible Management Education: C. Høgdal et al. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(1), 173-193.
Hilpert, J. C., & Marchand, G. C. (2018). Complex systems research in educational psychology: Aligning theory and method. Educational psychologist, 53(3), 185-202.
Hlebowitsh, P. (2010). Centripetal thinking in curriculum studies. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(4), 503-513.
Isfahani, Maryam Al-Sadat (2023). "Designing the first year of secondary school curriculum based on the use of artificial intelligence", Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management Sciences, No. 33, Volume 13, Year 6, Spring, pp. 1-16.
Jensen, A. A., & Krogh, L. (2017). Re-thinking curriculum for 21st-century learners: Examining the advantages and disadvantages of adding co-creative aspects to problem-based learning. In Co-creation in higher education: Students and educators preparing creatively and collaboratively to the challenge of the future (pp. 1-14). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Karami, Zohreh (2023). "Presenting a conceptual framework for designing a future-based curriculum", Quarterly Journal of Teacher Education Policy Studies, Volume 6, Issue 4, Winter, pp. 29-51.
 
KIRK, S. (2018). Enacting the curriculum in English for academic purposes: A legitimation code theory analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).
Kılıç, F., & Saygılı, S. (2022). New normal: The future curriculum development in education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2).
Luckin, R. (2019). Enhancing Learning and Teaching with Technology: What the Research Says. UCL Institute of Education Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (50th Anniversary ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Manopo, C. C., & Riyana, C. (2026, January). on Technology and Curriculum. In Proceedings of The 11th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies 2025: ICFET 2025 (p. 477). Springer Nature.
Mega, B., Suryaputra, R., & Handarini, D. M. (2026). Teacher Competence and Attitudes as Determinants of National Plus Curriculum Implementation Effectiveness. Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(2), 1890-1900
Mehrmohammadi, Mahmoud; Hosseini, Mohammad Hossein (2024). "Curriculum change and implementation", Tehran: Samt Publications
 
Morgan, C., & Sfard, A. (2016). Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: A discursive approach. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 92-119.
Muja, A., Blommaert, L., Gesthuizen, M., & Wolbers, M. H. (2019). The role of different types of skills and signals in youth labor market integration. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 6.
Narvekar, S., Peng, B., Leonetti, M., Sinapov, J., Taylor, M. E., & Stone, P. (2020). Curriculum learning for reinforcement learning domains: A framework and survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(181), 1-50.
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018). Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism–a conceptual framework. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 820-835.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of educational research, 75(2), 211-246.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
Saglietti, L., Mannelli, S., & Saxe, A. (2022). An analytical theory of curriculum learning in teacher-student networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 21113-21127.
Schwab, J. J. (2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 591-621.
Schwartz, P. (1991). The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. Doubleday.
Siemens, G. (2013). Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.
Singh, S., Arya, K. V., Rodriguez, C. R., & Mulani, A. O. (2025). Emerging Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Data Science and Signal Processing. Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS), 2439.
Toncic, J. C. (2022). Advancing a critical artificial intelligence theory for schooling. Teknokultura: Revista De Cultura Digital Y Movimientos Sociales, 19(1), 13-24.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2003). Futures research methodology. Washington: The.
Vaghjee, H. (2026). Transforming Education with AI: Sustainable Curriculum Development Approaches. In Innovating Business and Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 411-426). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Van Ooijen-van Der Linden, L., Van Der Smagt, M. J., Woertman, L., & Te Pas, S. F. (2017). Signal detection theory as a tool for successful student selection. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1193-1207.
Wang, B. (2025). Signal and system inspiration based on classroom teaching. Advances in Curriculum Design&Education, 1(3), 1-11.
Wei, X. (2018, July). The Study and Practice on Teaching Reform in Curriculum Group of Signal Processing Based on CDIO Mode. In 2018 International Seminar on Education Research and Social Science (ISERSS 2018) (pp. 416-418). Atlantis Press.
Wong, A., George, S., & Tanima, F. A. (2021). Operationalising dialogic accounting education through praxis and social and environmental accounting: Exploring student perspectives. Accounting Education, 30(5), 525-550
Wood, P., & Butt, G. (2014). Exploring the use of complexity theory and action research as frameworks for curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 676-696.
Xie, K., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Heddy, B. C., & Jiang, Z. (2024). Experience sampling methodology and technology: An approach for examining situational, longitudinal, and multi-dimensional characteristics of engagement. Educational technology research and development, 72(5), 2585-2615.
Zhao, C., & Yu, J. (2024). Relationship between teacher's ability model and students' behavior based on emotion-behavior relevance theory and artificial intelligence technology under the background of curriculum ideological and political education. Learning and Motivation, 88, 102040.
Zucker, T. A., Jacbos, E., & Cabell, S. Q. (2021). Exploring barriers to early childhood teachers’ implementation of a supplemental academic language curriculum. Early Education and Development, 32(8), 1194-1219.